ISC, Google Scholar, CAB Abstracts

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal

2 National Maize Research Program, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal

3 Nepal Agriculture Research Council, Nepal

10.26655/jrweedsci.2019.1.6

Abstract

Sustainable agriculture requires the use of environmentally friendly management practices. Mulching is one of the most effective methods that can play a positive role in weed management, improving soil properties as well as increasing crop production. A field experiment was conducted at the research farm of National Maize Research Program (NMRP), Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal during winter season, 2016. The experiment was carried out in single factor randomized completely block design comprising of nine weed management methods with four replications. Data regarding the weed population, weed dry weight, yield attributes and yield were recorded during the study. Different weed management practices showed significant differences on weed dynamics and weed control efficiencies. Black polythene mulch and silver black mulch was found more effective to reduce total weed density and dry weight during whole crop season and remain comparable with other polythene mulch too. The effect of weed management practices observed on weed density and dry weight were reflected on grain yield. The highest grain yield was recorded in silver black plastic mulch (4537.50 kg ha-1) followed by black plastic mulch (4068.20 kg ha-1), clear plastic mulch (4065.22 kg ha-1), green plastic mulch (3834.84 kg ha-1) and weed free (3222.74 kg ha-1) which were comparable to each other. At tasseling-silking stage among plastic mulch treatment, the higher moisture conservation observed on the black plastic mulch followed by clear plastic mulch, green plastic mulch and silver black plastic mulch. While comparing of plastic mulch with dead mulch, moisture on dead mulch remain higher than plastic mulch after 90 DAS. Thus, in humid subtropical region of western Chitwan, Rampur, the maize can be successfully cultivated by using different color of polythene mulch.

Keywords

Abdullahi S, Gautam G, Joy D. 2016. Effect of different weed control methods on growth and yield of maize (Zea Mays L.) under rainfed condition in Allahabad. J. Agric. Vet. Sci. 9: 44-47.
Ahmad M, Awan T.H, Sarwar G.M, Ahmad M, Yaseen S. 2004. Harmful insects, diseases, weeds of rice and their control. 7p.
Bond W, Grundy A.C. 2001.Non-chemical weed management in organic farming systems. Weed Res. 41: 383-405.
CBS. 2014. National population and housing census 2011. Population projection 2001-2031. Government of Nepal, National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics, Kathmandu, Nepal, August, Vol: 2.
Chaudhry A.R. 1983. Agronomy in “Maize in Pakistan” Punjab Agricultural Coordination Board, University.
Ghosheh H.Z, Holshouser D.L, Chandler J.M. 1996. The Critical Period of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control in Field Corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 44: 944-947.
Gill G.S, Vijaya Kumar K. 1969. Weed Index-A New Method of Reporting Weed Control Trials. Ind J Agron. 14: 96-98.
Gul B, Marwat K.B, Saeed M, Hussain Z, Ali H. 2011. Impact of tillage, plant population and mulches on weed management and grain yield of maize. Pak. J. Bot. 43: 1603-1606.
Jaishy S.N. 2000. Current fertility status of Nepal and IPNS. In: Jaishy S.N, Mandal S.N, TB. Subedi K.S, and Weber G. (eds.) Component of Integrated Plant Nutrient Management for Nepal. Proceedings of a Workshop at the Department of Agriculture, Harihar Bhawan, Lalitpur, 23 – 29 February. pp. 32-37.
Karki T, BK S.B, Mishra R.C. 2010. Critical period of weed control in maize. Nepalese Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 8: 39-47.
Khatri-Chhetri T.B. 1991. Introduction to soils and soil fertility. Tribhuvan University, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Rampur Chitwan, Nepal. pp. 164-198.
MoAD-ABPSD. 2016. Statistical information on Nepalese agriculture 2015/16 (2072/073). Government of Nepal, Ministry of Agricultural Development, agribusiness promotion and Statistics Division, singhadurbar, Kathmandu, Nepal.
MoF- Economic Survey. 2016. Economic survey fiscal year 2015/16 (2072/73). Government of Nepal, Ministry of Finance, Singhadurbar, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Nadeem M.A, Ahmad R, Khalid M, Naveed M, Tanveer A, Ahmad J.N. 2008. Growth and yield response of autumn planted maize (Zea mays L.) and its weeds to reduced doses of herbicide application in combination with urea. Pak. J. Bot. 40: 667-676.
Pandey A.K, Prakash V, Singh R.D, Mani V.P. 2000. Integrated weed management in maize (Zea mays). Ind J Agron. 46: 260-265.
Patel V.J, Upadhyay P.N, Patel J. B, Meisuriya M.I. 2006. Effect of Herbicide mixtures on weeds in kharif maize (Zea Mays L.) under Middle Gujarat conditions. Ind J Weed Sci. 38: 54-57.
Rajablariani H.R, Hassankhan F, Rafezi R. 2012. Effect of colored plastic mulches on yield of tomato and weed biomass. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development. 3: 590-593.
Rajablariani H.R, Sheykhmohamady M. 2015. Growth of Sweet Corn and Weeds in Response to Colored Plastic Mulches. Journal of Advanced Agricultural Technologies. 2: 42-45.
Sapkota D, Pokhrel S. 2013. Community based maize seed production in the hills and mountains of Nepal: A review. Agronomy Journal of Nepal. 1: 107-112.
Summers C.G, Stapleton J.J. 2002.Management of Corn Leafhopper (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) and Corn Stunt Disease in Sweet Corn Using Reflective Mulch. Journal of Economic Entomology. 95: 325-330.
Thakur D.R, Sharma V. 1996. Integrated Weed Management in Rainfed Maize (Zea mays L.). Ind J Weed Sci. 28: 207-208.