ISC, Google Scholar, CAB Abstracts

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Crop Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Gezira, P. O. Box 20, Wad Medani, Sudan

2 Crop Protection Research Center, Agricultural Research Corporation, Wad Medani, Sudan

3 Department of Crop Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Gezira, Wad Medani, Sudan

4 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Imam Mohammed Ibn Saud Islamic University, Saudi Arabia

10.26655/JRWEEDSCI.2023.6.2

Abstract

Water weeds are notorious for causing various troubles. Gezira Scheme in Sudan is being choked by the increasing proliferation of aquatic weeds. This study aimed to look at the association between aquatic weed abundance and water quality in some canals in Sudan's Gezira Scheme in the year 2018. The study area included 18 sites, i.e. 6 canals classified into 3 parts (beginning, middle, and end). The abundance of aquatic weed species was evaluated visually at each site using a scale of (0-5), and water quality was examined by assessing physical, chemical, and biological properties. Descriptive statistics and variance analysis were used to analyze the data. The findings revealed that community structure was comprised of significant changes in the abundance of aquatic weed species throughout the year, as follows: floating (1.7-2.1), emergent (0.2-0.3), submergent (0.3), and bank aquatic weeds (1.5-2.2). In winter and summer, the most abundant species were Vossia cuspidata (4.0) and Cynodon dactylon (3.0-3.7). Temperature and turbidity were shown to be the most critical elements in restricting the development and abundance of aquatic weeds, along with alkalinity, salinity, and nutrients. The canals are habitat to a diverse range of living organisms, including animals, bacteria, fungi, and algae, which indicates the water's appropriateness for the presence and development of aquatic weeds. All of these insights will be valuable in the management of aquatic weeds in Gezira scheme's canals.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Introduction

Aquatic plants are plant species that thrive entirely or partially in the water (Kheir, 1992). They are classified into three types based on their growth pattern since various growth patterns necessitate various management. The types are: (i) free floating on the water surface, (ii) rooted in the sediment with floating or emergent shoots/leaves, and (iii) sediment-rooted or un-rooted submerged plants with their shoots (nearly) totally submerged (Hussner et al., 2017). Abdu (1979) grouped aquatic weeds in Sudan's Gezira irrigation system into two groups: emergent and bank aquatic weeds, and submergent aquatic weeds. Druijff (1979) characterized aquatic weeds into five groups: floating, emergent, weeds extending from the bank into the water, submergent, and bank aquatic weeds.

   Aquatic plants are generally affected by variables that are inextricably linked to water body limnology, such as physical factors, sediment, climate, and hydrology. These variables are influenced by the characteristics of waterbodies as well as the agricultural components of their watershed. Furthermore, biological interactions such as competition, predation, and disease have an impact on aquatic plants (Lacoul and Freedman, 2006). Aquatic plants, like all the other plants, need light and CO2 (or even other inorganic carbonaceous materials) for photosynthesis, oxygen for respiration, water, and nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and others to survive or thrive. The pH, alkalinity, water hardness (temporary or permanent), conductivity, and dissolved gases such as oxygen and CO2 levels are all common water quality characteristics that influence aquatic weeds. These parameters can be treated independently or together, as the level of one parameter influences or is correlated to the levels of the others. Changes in environmental variables influence the number of aquatic plants. This information can be utilized to determine the presence or absence and populations that are trustworthy markers of significant changes in their environment, including those that could serve as ecological integrity standards (Crossley, 2002).

     Sudan's Gezira Scheme was the country's first large-scale irrigated agricultural development (Plusquellec, 1990) plays an important role in Sudan's agricultural sector (Eldaw, 2004). The scheme was created in the 1920s with the primary goal of producing cotton. Other crops were initially cultivated to just provide food for agricultural laborers and to aid in the conservation and protection of soil nutrients. Cotton, wheat, and groundnut/sorghum are grown in a four-course rotation that also includes fallow land (Plusquellec, 1990). The irrigated area is located south of Khartoum city in the smooth, fertile plains, between latitudes 13˚ 30 North and 15˚ 30 North, and longitudes 32˚ 15 East and 33˚ 45 East. The scheme's total initial area was approximately 476,700 hectares at the time of its inception in 1925. (1.135 million feddans). The initial area was expanded to the southwest in the early 1960s to incorporate the Manaqil Extension, bringing the scheme's total area under irrigated agriculture to 882,000 hectares (2.1 million feddans). Water is delivered to the scheme's irrigated areas via two main canals (the Gezira and Managil main canals), which connect to the Sinnar Dam. The main canals are divided into major canals, which are further subdivided into the minor canals that transport irrigation water to field ditches via gated field outlet pipes noun as (Abu XXs). Every (Abu XX) has nine canals noun as (Abu VIs) that irrigate 37.8 hectares (90 feddans). Each canal (Abu VI) irrigates 4.2 hectares (ten feddans). Aside from the canalization system, the irrigation network of Gezira scheme includes a drainage system comprised of major and minor drains (Eldaw, 2004).

   The designation of the canals provides ideal conditions for the growth of aquatic weeds, so that the study of their abundance is important to identify species and community and to identify the existence or potential of problems of aquatic weeds (Alhadari et al., 2020c). Likewise, the study of water quality parameters (physical, chemical, and biological) is of high significance that might affect the community composition of aquatic plants in the canals in winter and summer. As a consequence, the current study was conducted to assess the relationship among both aquatic weed abundance and water quality across several minor canals at Centre Group at Gezira Scheme, Sudan (2018).

 

Materials and Methods

2.1. Location

The research was conducted at Gezira Scheme's center group. The research region is located across latitudes 14° 15 North and 14° 20 North and longitudes 33° 20 East and 33° 30 East (Table 1). The region's climate is semi-desert, with just an average rainfall range between 100 mm and 250 mm, with the annual rainfall lasting from June to October and dry weather lasting from March to June. The yearly evapotranspiration average is 2400 mm/year. The average yearly lowest and highest temperatures are 12 °C in January and 42 12 °C in May. The area's soil is heavy (clay 60%), with a pH of 8-8.5, low organic matter and nitrogen, enough potassium, and low accessible phosphorus (Elbasher, 2016).

 

 

Table 1. Geographical distribution of aquatic species in six canals of center group at Gezira scheme, Sudan, in winter and summer, 2018, as determined by a geographical positioning system (GPS)

Name

Point

Longitude

Latitude

Barakaat 1

Beginning

556806

1586755

Middle

556850

1585328

End

556896

1583869

Barakaat 2

Beginning

555618

1584060

Middle

555556

1586072

End

555508

1587616

Barakaat 3

Beginning

552489

1588669

Middle

552459

1589987

End

552409

1591852

Al sunni

Beginning

546090

1594068

Middle

546310

1594166

End

546882

1594402

Al Ibrahimi

Beginning

545118

1596717

Middle

546169

1597163

End

547181

1597560

Hajj Al-Nour

Beginning

544331

1580564

Middle

544777

1580072

End

545011

1579801

 

2.2.  Experimentation

Six canals in the Gezira Scheme's Centre Group were chosen at random for the study: Barakaat 1, Barakaat 2, Barakaat 3, Al sunni, Al Ibrahimi, and Hajj Al-Nour. Each canal includes three sections: beginning, middle, and end. As a result, the study area is composed of 18 sites (six canals x three sections). The abundance of aquatic weeds at every site was evaluated, and water quality parameters associated with changes in aquatic weed seasonal growth were investigated in summer and winter. The research includes all aquatic species found in canals and their banks. The research was carried out in 2018 in winter (January, February, and March) and summer (August, September, and October). The sites were visited once a month for three months in every season.

2.3. Aquatic weeds abundance

Visual observation was used to gather data on the abundance of aquatic weeds. Yousif (2019) recommended this technique. Visual observation was used to evaluate the abundance of aquatic weed species in the beginnings, middles, and ends of the canals, using a scale of (0 - 5) where:

0 ≡ Not present.

1 ≡ Any number of plants spouse to cover less than 5% of water surface.

2 ≡ Any number of plants spouse to cover 5 to 25% of water surface.

3 ≡ Any number of plants spouse to cover 25 to 50% of water surface.

4 ≡ Any number of plants spouse to cover 50-75% of water surface.

5 ≡ Plants that spouse to cover more than 75% of the area.

2.4. Water quality

The physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of water were determined at each study site to assess water quality. Surface water samples were taken at each research site every three months during the summertime and the wintertime. Plastic bottles of l liter capacity were used for the collection and preservation of water samples from beginnings, middles, and ends of the canals. Care was taken to prevent samples against sunlight while transporting them to the laboratory. The samples were stored in an air-cooled chamber until analysis in the laboratory.

2.4.1. Physical characteristics

Determination of water temperature (Thermometer measurement)

Water temperatures of the site visits were recorded at sampling sites using a mercury thermometer at 30-min sampling intervals (APHA 1995, 2550 B, 2-59).

2.4.2. Chemical characteristics

Determination of water pH

The pH was determined using the electrometric method. The pH of water samples was determined with the aid of a pH meter (ISO CL 8-5.3. SOP/WTD/01).

Determination of water conductivity

The conductivity was determined by using the conductivity meter. The unit for total dissolved salts (TDS) was (mg L‾¹), and the unit for electrical conductivity (EC) was (dS m‾¹). A conductivity meter (APHA 1995, 2510A, 2-43) (ISOCL 8- 5.3. SOP/WTD/03) is utilized for measuring EC and TDS.

Determination of water total hardness (mg/l)

The total hardness (mg/l) was determined using the EDTA titrimetric method. Ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) forms a soluble chelated complex in alkaline conditions. When a small amount of Erichrome black -T indicator was added to the water sample under alkaline conditions, the Ca++ and Mg++ ions developed a wine-red color. When this was titrated against EDTA, the Ca++ and Mg++ ions complexed with EDTA produced a sharp change in color from wine red to sky blue (APHA 1995, 2340, 2-35) (ISOCL 8-5.3. SOP/WTD/07).

Determination of water calcium (mg/l)

Calcium (mg/l) was determined by using the EDTA titrimetric method. When EDTA was added to water that contains both calcium and magnesium ions, it initially combines with calcium. Ca++ can be directly determined by titrating the sample which was made sufficiently alkaline (2.00 ml of NaOH solution) against EDTA using the Murexide indicator. The endpoint is the solution changes from pink to clear purple color (APHA 1995,3500-Ca, 3-56) (ISOCL 8- 5.3. SOP/WTD/08).

Determination of water magnesium (mg/l)

The magnesium (mg/l) was determined using the EDTA titrimetric method. Magnesium ions were calculated by subtracting the total hardness and calcium ions from the water sample (APHA 1995, 3500-Ca, 3-56) (ISOCL 8- 5.3. SOP/WTD/08).

Determination of water sodium (Na+ mg/l)

The sodium (Na+ mg/l) was determined using the flame photometric method. The amount of sodium was determined by Flame photometry 410 (APHA 1995, 3500-Na D, 3-96) (ISOCL 8- 5.3. SOP/WTD/10).      

Determination of water potassium (K+ mg/l)

Potassium (K+ mg/l) was determined using the flame photometric method. The amount of potassium was determined by Flame photometry 410 (APHA 1995, 3500-Na D, 3-96) (ISOCL 8- 5.3. SOP/WTD/10).

Determination of water chloride (Cl¯ mg/l))

Chloride (Cl¯ mg/l) was determined by using the argentometric method. The silver nitrate was titrated with chloride and potassium chromate using as an indicator to indicate the end point of this titration. Prior to the formation of red silver chromate, silver was quantitatively precipitated.

Determination of water bicarbonate (H CO3as mg/l)

The bicarbonate (HCO3as mg/l) was determined by using the titrimetric method. Bicarbonates were estimated by titrating the sample against (1N HCl) using Methyl orange as an indicator till the solution turns from orange to pink (Wilcox and Hatcher 1950 USDA California para 16).

Determination of water carbonate (CO3‾ ‾as mg/L)

 Carbonate (CO3‾ ‾as mg/L) was determined using the titrimetric method. The carbonate content of water sample was determined by titrating it with a strong acid, H2SO4, and using phenolphthalein to serve as an indicator. A pink to colorless end point was observed (Wilcox and Hatcher 1950 USDA California para 16).

Determination of water turbidity

Turbidity was determined using the turbidity meter (NTU). Turbidity was measured using a turbidity meter and demonstrated in Nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) (APHA 1995, 2130 B, 2-9) (ISOCL 8- 5.3. SOP/WTD/03).

2.4.3. Biological characteristics

Water samples were taken from the six canals during the wintertime and summertime to check for the existence of biological entities. In addition, some water samples were transported to the laboratory for samples culturing to give an indication of the presence of any microorganisms like fungi and bacteria. The samples were streaked on plates containing nutrient agar (NA) medium using a sterilized loop. The plates were incubated at room temperature for 24 hours.

2.5. Statistical analysis

At p 0.5, data were subjected to descriptive analysis as well as analysis of variance. To distinguish between significant means, Duncan's Multiple Range Test was used. The data was analyzed using Microsoft Excel, Statistics 8, and MSTATC.

Results

3.1. Abundance of aquatic weeds

In winter, the abundance of floating weeds was greater in the canal beginnings (25- 50%) than in the middles (5-25%) and ends (5%). In summer, the abundance of floating weeds in canal beginnings and middles was greater (5-25%) than in canal ends (5%) (Table 2). During the winter season, Azolla sp., Ipomoea aquatic, and Ludwigia palustris was abundant approximately at a constant percentage (5-50%) at the beginning, middle, and end, Pistia stratiotes was available only at the beginning (5-25%), while Vossia cuspidata was more abundant compared to the rest of the floating weeds, where it is available at a ratio of (˃ 75%) and (50-75%) and (50-75%) at the beginning, middle and end, respectively. In summer, Ipomoea aquatica was abundance at a constant percentage (5-50%) at the beginning, middle and end, Ludwigia palustris and Pistia stratiotes disappeared at the end, while Vossia cuspidata was more abundant compared to the rest of the floating weeds, where it was available at a ratio of (50-75%) at the beginning, middle and end.

 

 

Table 2. Abundance of floating weeds in the six canals in center group at Gezira scheme, Sudan in winter and summer, 2018

Species

Beginning

Middle

End

Average STDEV

Winter season

 

 

 

 

Azolla sp.

2

2

2

2.0 ∓ 0.00

Ipomoea aquatic

2

3

2

2.3 ∓ 0.6

Ludwigia palustris

2

2

0

1.3 ∓ 1.2

Pistia stratiotes

2

0

0

0.7 ∓ 1.2

Vossia cuspidate

5

4

3

4.0 ∓ 1.00

Average

2.6

2.2

1.4

2.1 ∓ 0.6

Summer season

 

 

 

 

Echinochloa stagnina

0

0

0

0.0   ∓ 0.0

Ipomoea aquatic

2

2

2

2.0 ∓ 0.0

Ludwigia palustris

2

2

0

1.3 ∓ 0.2

Pistia stratiotes

2

1

0

1.0 ∓ 1.0

Vossia cuspidate

4

4

4

4.0 ∓ 0.0

Average

2

1.8

1.2

1.7 ∓ 0.2

* Scale: 0≡ absent, 1≡ (˂ 5%), 2≡ (5-25%), 3≡ (25-50%), 4≡ (50-75%), 5≡ (˃ 75%).

 

Emergent weeds were absent in the beginnings and middles of canals and plentiful, but of small cover in ends of canals (˃ 5 %) in winter. In summer, emergent weeds were absent in all sections of canals (Table 3). In winter, emergent weeds (Cyperus alopecuroides, Polygonum glabrum, and Typha latifolia) were not available at the middle and end, Cyperus alopecuroides was available at a constant percentage (˂ 5%), Polygonum glabrum was not available throughout the season, while Typha latifolia was available only at the end (˂ 5%). In summer, Cyperus alopecuroides appeared at the beginning (˂ 5%), Polygonum glabrum was not available throughout the season, while Typha latifolia was available only at the end (˂ 5%).

Likewise, submergent weeds were present only in the end of one canal (Baraakat II) in plentiful, but of small cover (˃ 5 %) in the winter season (Table 4) and completely absent in all three sections of canals in summer. Najas pectinate was available only at the end (˂ 5%).

 

The abundance of bank aquatic weeds was higher in the ends of canals (25 – 50%) and equal in the beginnings and middles of canals (5-25%) in winter, and also equally in beginnings, middles, and ends of canals in the summer season (5-25%) (Table 5). In winter, Cynodon dactylon was available at a ratio of (50-75%) at the beginning and (25-50%) at the middle, while Ipomoea hildebrandtii was not available throughout the season. In winter, Cynodon dactylon was available at a constant percentage a ratio of (25- 50%) at the beginning, middle, and end, while Ipomoea hildebrandtii was not available throughout the season.

 

Table 3. Abundance of emergent weeds in six canals in center group at Gezira Scheme, Sudan in winter and summer, 2018

Species

Beginning

Middle

End

Average STDEV

Winter season

 

 

 

 

Cyperus alopecuroides

0

1

1

0.7 ∓ 0.6

Polygonum glabrum

0

0

0

0.0 ∓ 0.0

Typha latifolia

0

0

1

0.3 ∓ 0.6

Average

0

0.3

0.7

0.3 ∓ 0.4

Summer season

 

 

 

 

Cyperus alopecuroides

1

0

0

0.3∓0.6

Polygonum glabrum

0

0

0

0.0∓0.0

Typha latifolia

0

0

1

0.3∓0.6

Average

0.3

0

0.3

0.2∓0.2

* Scale: 0≡ absent, 1≡ (˂ 5%), 2≡ (5-25%), 3≡ (25-50%), 4≡ (50-75%), and 5≡ (˃ 75%).



Table 4. Abundance of submergent weeds in six canals in center group at Gezira Scheme, Sudan in winter, 2018

Species

Beginning

Middle

End

Average STDEV

Najas pectinata

0

0

1

0.3∓0.6

Average

0

0

1

0.3∓0.6

* Scale: 0≡ absent, 1≡ (˂ 5%), 2≡ (5-25%), 3≡ (25-50%), 4≡ (50-75%), and 5≡ (˃ 75%).

 

Table 5. Abundance of bank aquatic weeds in six canals in center group at Gezira Scheme, Sudan in winter and summer, 2018

Species

Beginning

Middle

End

Average STDEV

Winter season

 

 

 

 

Cynodon dactylon

4

4

3

3.7 ∓ 0.6

Ipomoea hildebrandtii

Average

0

2

0

2

2

2.5

0.6 ∓ 1.2

2.2 ∓ 0.3

Summer season

 

 

 

 

Cynodon dactylon

3

3

3

3   ∓ 0.0

Ipomoea hildebrandtii

0

0

0

0.0 ∓ 0.0

Average

1.5

1.5

1.5

1.5 ∓ 0.0

* Scale: 0≡ absent, 1≡ (˂ 5%), 2≡ (5-25%), 3≡ (25-50%), 4≡ (50-75%), and 5≡ (˃ 75%).

 

Generally, floating weeds were of higher abundance in the beginnings and middles of the canals compared with the abundance in the ends of these canals. Emergent weeds were absent in canals except for very low abundance in the ends of canals in winter. Submergent weeds were present only in winter and were abundant, but of small cover in the end of only one canal (Baraakat II). Bank aquatic weeds were equally in abundance in beginnings and middles of canals with high abundance in the ends of canals in the winter season compared with other sections.

3.2. Water quality

3.2.1. Physical characteristics

The temperature of surface water increased in summer (38 °C) compared with winter (24 °C) (Tables 6 and 7).

  

3.2.2. Chemical characteristics

The results of chemical water quality indicated that most of the parameters decreased when comparing summer and winter (Tables 6 and 7). The pH was decreased from 7.47 to 6.88, TDS from 203.9 to 186 mg/l, Ca++ from 1.6 to 1.2 meq/l, Mg++ from 0.73 to 0.65 meq/l, Na+ from 10.2 to 4.3 ppm, K+ from 5.4 to 2.1 ppm and HCO3 ¯ from 2.12 to 1.91 meq/l. On the other hand, EC (0.2 dS/m) and Cl¯ (1.2 meq/l) were not changed with the changes of seasons. Moreover, CO3¯ did not found in the water of canals. However, turbidity increased in the summer season (186 NTU) compared to winter (34 NTU). There were no considerable differences between the values of most parameters in the heads, middles, and ends of all canals with an exceptional case of turbidity that decreased from the heads to the ends.

 

 Table 6. Analysis of physical and chemical characteristics of water in six canals in Center group at Gezira scheme, Sudan in winter, 2018

Average STDEV

End

Middle

Beginning

Parameters

24 ∓ 2.8

27∓5.7

(1:00 PM)

23.5 ∓ 2.1

(11:00 AM)

21.5 ∓ 0.7

(10:00 AM) 

Temperature (ºC)

7.47∓0.04

7.52∓0.30

7.4 ∓0.39

7.45∓0.29

pH

0.20∓0.00

0.20∓0.00

0.20∓ 0.00

0.20∓0.00

EC (dS/m)

203.9∓7.4

195.7∓  29.8

206.3∓12.7

210.2∓13.8

TDS (mg/l)

1.6 ∓2.7

1.6 ∓0.2

1.6 ∓0.1

1.6 ∓0.1

Ca++ meq/I

0.72 ∓0.03

0.69∓0.17

0.74 ∓0.09

0.74∓0.05

Mg ++ meq/I

10.2 ∓0.45

9.7∓2.87

10.2∓1.45

10.6∓1.30

Na+ ppm

5.38 ∓ 3.67

9.62∓3.55

3.17∓0.71

3.35∓0.91

K+ ppm

1.22∓0.04

1.2 ∓0.00

1.2∓0.13

1.27∓0.10

Cl¯ meq/I

2.12∓0.03

2.1 ∓0.07

2.1∓0.13

2.16∓0.09

HCO3¯ meq/I

0.0 ∓ 0.00

0.0 ∓0.00

0.0∓0.00

0.0 ∓ 0.00

CO3 ¯ meq/I

34 ∓ 2.8

44 ∓ 4.2

30 ∓7.8

 30 ∓ 3.5

Turbidity NTU

 

Table 7. Analysis of physical and chemical characteristics of water in six canals in center group at Gezira scheme, Sudan in summer, 2018

Parameters

Beginning

Middle

End

Average STDEV

Temperature (°C)

36∓1.4

(10:00 AM)

37.5∓2.1

(11:00 AM)

.41∓1.4

(1:00 PM)

38∓1.6

pH

7.03∓0.46

6.80∓0.41

6.80∓0.20

6.88∓0.13

EC (dS/m)

0.20∓0.00

0.20∓0.00

0.20∓0.00

0.20 ∓ 0.0

TDS (mg/I)

186 ∓9.23

187∓5.89

186∓6.86

186∓0.58

Ca++ meq/I

1.22∓0.11

1.23∓0.13

1.28∓0.07

1.24∓0.03

Mg ++ meq/I

0.64∓0.03

0.65∓0.02

0.66∓0.02

0.65∓0.01

Na+ ppm

4.1 ∓0.36

4.1 ∓0.30

4.6 ∓ 0.35

4.3 ∓ 0.29

K+ ppm

2.07∓0.27

2.07∓0.34

2.02∓0.26

2.05∓0.03

Cl¯ meq/I

1.3 ∓0.10

1.2 ∓0.13

1.2 ∓ 0.13

1.2 ∓ 0.06

HCO3¯ meq/I

1.99∓0.18

1.88∓0.21

1.86∓0.20

1.91∓0.07

CO3¯  meq/I

0.0 ∓0.00

0.0 ∓0.00

0.0 ∓ 0.00

0.0 ∓ 0.00

Turbidity NTU

239∓59.4

19 3∓7.1

125 ∓74.2           

186∓ 2.6

 

3.2.3. Biological characteristics

The findings revealed that several species of animals, such as fish and frogs, were present in water samples collected from the six canals during both winter and summer (Table 8). It also consisted of invertebrates such as insects; Dragonflies, Mayflies, Mosquitoes, snails; pouch snails and Mollusca, spiders, and worms. Culturing of water samples indicated that water samples have no fungi but consisted of three species of bacteria.

 

Table 8. Analysis of biological characteristics of water in six canals in center group at Gezira scheme, Sudan in winter and summer, 2018

Organisms

 

Detection

 

Winter season

Summer season

Vertebrates

Fish

+

+

 

Frogs

-

+

Invertebrates

Dragonflies

+

+

 

Mayflies

+

+

 

Mosquitoes

+

+

 

Snails

+

+

 

Spiders

+

+

 

Worms

+

-

Fungi

 

-

-

Bacteria

 

+

       +

Algae

 

+

-

* + Detected

* - Not detected

 

Discussion

According to the findings, Vossia cuspidata and Cynodon dactylon dominate all other aquatic species in terms of abundance. Typha latifolia and Najas pectinata have very low abundance values. This research demonstrated the significance of abundance in the community structure of aquatic weeds, as described by (Ghavzan et al., 2006; Alhadari et al., 2020a; 2020b).  Floating weeds and bank aquatic weeds were more abundant than other species. This is most likely owing to the siltation of canal bottoms and sometimes accumulations of submerged weeds, which creates favorable habitats for species such as Vossia cuspidat, Cynodon dactylon, and Ipomoea aquatica. Along with Ischaemum afrum, the most frequent bank weeds were Acacia spp. The majority of the canals were free of submerged weeds, which might be attributed to the hydrological characteristics of the canals, such as depth with fast stream and mechanical clearance. Abdel Gadir also reported on this (1986, 1987). The findings revealed that the abundance of various species in the canals was greater in the winter season than in the summer season, as previously reported by Abdel Gadir et al. (1986,1987), and was attributed primarily to the turbidity of water in summer compared to the clearest water in winter.

Also, the results of water quality indicated that water temperature is an important factor, because changes in temperature during summer and winter may affect the growth of aquatic weeds. Sharon (1997) stated that the temperature of a river is significant because it affects the rate of photosynthesis and has a direct effect on the development of aquatic weeds. Furthermore, Sand (1989) mentioned that temperature is a significant factor that affects the establishment of aquatic macrophytes. The higher the temperature, the greater the requirement for oxygen, and food and the faster the growth rate. This might explain the temperature effect on the growth rate of some emergent weeds during the summer season compared with the winter season. The Absence of submergent weeds in most canals in summer, where the temperature and turbidity were higher than in the winter season referred to the effect of temperature and turbidity on the growth of submergent weeds. This also agreed with McCaffrey (2019) who reported that high turbidity affects submerged plants by preventing sufficient light from reaching them for photosynthesis. High turbidity also has the capacity to significantly increase the water temperature. While, water temperature is affected by air temperature, stormwater runoff, groundwater inflows, turbidity, and exposure to sunlight .The pH levels increased in the winter months (pH 7.47), while the rate of growth of most aquatic weeds increased when matched to summer (pH 6.88). This agreed with Titus et al. (1990). Although, high pH levels (pH 9) may limit the growth of aquatic weeds due to low levels of dissolved CO2 and low pH levels (below pH 5) may affect HCO3¯ ions. Where HCO3¯ ions are nearly absent and inorganic carbon is available mainly as dissolved CO2, and thus acquisition of carbon can become the rate-limiting step of photosynthesis (Haines, 1980).

Salinity also influences the growth of aquatic weeds. Where the distribution and abundance of most aquatic weeds in the canals particularly floating weeds increased with increases in TDS in winter and decreased in summer. This finding is also consistent with McCaffrey (2019), who mentioned that salt content is usually highest during the low flows, which increases as water levels decrease and affects nutrient availability to plant root systems. The typical (EC) range in irrigation water is (0-3 dS/m-1) (Ayers and Westcot, 1985). This means that conductivity was very low (0.2 dS/m-1) in both summer and winter, pointing to a low concentration of dissolved electrolyte ions present in the water. The specific ions in the water are not identified by conductivity. Significant increases in conductivity, on the other hand, may indicate that polluting discharges have entered the water (McCaffrey, 2019).

The results revealed that almost all chemical properties of water rose in winter as compared to summer. Rises in nutrient (chemical element) concentrations throughout the winter likely accelerate the growth of floating weeds. This is agreed with (Pieterse et al., 1981). Whereas, free-floating weeds like (water lettuce) Pistia stratiotes and (water fern) Azolla spp. should obtain all nutrients from the water column. Once nutrient concentrations are low, Pistia stratriotes grow more slowly, and the mortality rate may indeed be greater than the rate of growth (Junk and Piedade 1997).

The usual range of (Na+) in water for irrigation is (0-40 meq/l) (Ayers and Westcot, 1985). The results showed sodium rates were (0.3-0.5 meq/l) during both summer and winter, this is an indication of lower rates of (Na+) in the canals which agreed with McCaffrey (2019) who reported that sodium is generally found in lower concentration than calcium and magnesium in fresh water and industrial effluents are the major sources of sodium in water. The results also may explain the less importance of sodium uptake for most aquatic plants. This is consistent with (Sculthorpe, 1967), who reported that sodium may excrete from leaf tissue to enable the uptake of other more vital cations, like potassium or calcium, but potassium and calcium are not regarded major obstacles for aquatic plant productivity (Thiebaut et al., 2002). The low concentration of sodium may limit the growth of submergent weeds. This was further mentioned by (Howard-Williams and Liptort, 1980) who reported that in the open water of many aquatic systems as low concentrations of Sodium (Na+) directly limit the growth of submersed machrophytes.

The usual range of chloride (Cl-) concentrations in water for irrigation is (0-30 meq/l) (Ayers and Westcot, 1985). The results showed that there was very little chlorine in the six canals. Chloride concentrations in wastewater are higher than in raw water (McCaffrey, 2019). Low concentrations of chloride in water may limit the growth of submergent weeds. This was also reported by (Howard-Williams and Liptort, 1980) who pointed out that in the open water of many aquatic systems as low concentrations of chloride (Cl-) directly limit the growth of submersed machrophytes.

According to the findings, the water in the canals comprises HCO3¯ as a sort of organic carbon, which increases in winter. The use of HCO3¯ affects the photosynthetic rates and influences in community structure of aquatic weeds. This was consented upon (Sand et al., 1992) who stated that the ability to use HCO3¯, probably influences the species composition of machrophytes communities strongly, and the availability of HCO3¯ enhanced photosynthetic performance in aquatic species. Bicarbonate is regarded as one of the primary predictors in general since bicarbonate concentration levels are associated to conductivity across most forms of freshwater resources, and pH is further strictly controlled by bicarbonate concentration levels throughout the range of low alkaline to high alkaline waters (Leuven et al., 1992).

Turbidity levels increased during the summer season when compared to clear water during the winter season, affecting the growth, production, and spread of aquatic weeds. During the winter, most aquatic weeds have a high percentage of frequency and abundance. While high turbidity during the summer season prevents sunlight to penetrate deep water and this affects the growth of aquatic weeds, especially submergent weeds. This result was consistent with the findings of Plusquellec (1990), who demonstrated that when there is a massive silt stress in the waterways, sunlight permeation through into the water is constrained and weed development is hindered. In Sudan, the system is designed trying to draw better and clear water from stockpiling at Sennar Dam in January, leading to rapid weed infestation, especially in the canals. Silt is then accumulated inside the sluggish water all around weeds, creating an ideal environment for more weed growth, and worsening the situation. This finding was indeed noted in the Alaska Fact Sheet (Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, 2015), which stated that turbidity impacts the rate of growth of algae as well as other aquatic plants by reducing the amount of light available for photosynthesis. Because suspended particles absorb more heat, turbidity can raise water temperature. Dissolved oxygen levels fall as a result of these factors.

The findings revealed that the water in the canals in winter and summer contains a diverse range of living creatures. Because they live on the bottom of a stream or lake and do not travel long distances, these organisms are useful indicators of the safety of aquatic habitats. As a consequence, they have no way to migrate away from pollutants or environmental stress easily or quickly. Because different species of living life forms react differently to selective stressors like pollution, silt loading, and habitat changes, quantifying the diversity and density of different living organisms at a given site may offer a view of the environmental conditions of that body of water (WET Foundation Project, 2011).

    When multicellular creatures are subjected to an environmental hazard (e.g., carbon emissions, heating because of reduced flows, weak dissolved oxygen due to algal growth, etc.), those that are unaccepting to that strain may perish. Tolerant living creatures frequently colonize the spaces left by intolerant organisms, resulting in an entirely new population of organisms. A body of water that has not been impacted, for example, will usually comprise a vast bulk of living creatures that are sensitive to environmental stress factors, such as mayflies (Ephemeroptera), stoneflies (Plecoptera), and caddisflies (Trichoptera). A water body that has been subjected to environmental stress may comprise a vast bulk of living organisms that are tolerant of these conditions, such as leeches (Hirudinea), tubifex worms (Tubifex sp.), and pouch snails (Tubifex sp). (Gastropoda) (WET Foundation Project, 2011).

Conclusion

The aquatic weed community structure in the Gezira scheme's canals comprises various kinds of aquatic weeds with varying abundance. This may be attributed to many factors such as physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of water quality, which affect the growth and abundance of aquatic species in winter and summer. More studies should be conducted to determine water quality conditions in irrigation systems within irrigated schemes to be able to determine how parameters of water quality may affect the growth and abundance of aquatic weeds.

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest have been declared.

________________________________________________________________________________________

Copyright © 2023 by SPC (Sami Publishing Company) + is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

 

 

  1. References

    1. Abdel Gadir, H. 1987. Annual Report of the Gezira Research Station. Season 1986/87. Ministry of Agriculture. Agricultural research corporation. [Crossref], [Google scholar], [Publisher]
    2. Abdel Gadir, H. 1988. Aquatic weeds. Annual Report of the Gezira Research Station. Season 1988/89. Ministry of Agriculture. Agricultural research corporation.[Crossref], [Google scholar], [Publisher]
    3. Abdu K.M., 1979. Aquatic weeds in irrigation schemes--the engineer's viewpoint. In Aquatic weed management: integrated control techniques for the Gezira irrigation scheme: report of a workshop, 3-6 December 1978, Wad Medani, Sudan. Wad Medani, Sudan, University of Gezira, 1979. [Google scholar], [Publisher]
    4. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. 2015. Fact Sheet: Turbidity in Surface Waters. 410 Willoughby Ave, Suite 303, Juneau, AK 99811. dec.alaska.gov (907) 465-5185...[Crossref], [Google scholar], [Publisher]
    5. Alhadari S.O., Dafaallah A.B., Zaroug S., 2020. Composition and Distribution of Aquatic Weeds in some Minor Canals, Gezira Scheme, Sudan (2018).Crossref], [Google scholar], [Publisher]
    6. Alhadari S.O., Dafaallah A.B. Zaroug M.S., Distribution and Mapping of Aquatic Weeds in some Minor Canals, Gezira Scheme, Sudan (2018).[Google scholar],[Publisher]
    7. Alhadari S.O., Dafaallah B., Zaroug M.S., Farmer’s Awareness to the Impact of Aquatic Weeds in some Minor Canals, Gezira Scheme, Sudan (2018).[Crossref],
    8. Rice E.W., Bridgewater L.,American Public Health Association eds., 2012. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (Vol. 10). Washington, DC: American public health association. [Google scholar]
    9. Ayers, R.S. and Westcot, D.W. 1985. Water quality for agriculture. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 29 Rev .1. Aznar, J., Dervieux, A., and Grillas, P. (2002). Association between aquatic vegetation and landscape indicators of human pressure. Wetlands, 23:149–160. [Crossref], [Publisher]
    10. Crossley, M.N., 2003. The effects of water flow, pH and nutrition on the growth of the native aquatic plant, Aponogeton elongatus. [Google scholar], [Publisher]
    11. Druijff, A.H., 1979. Manual and mechanical control of aquatic weeds in watercourses. Manual and mechanical control of aquatic weeds in watercourses., 18, pp.137-145. [Google scholar], [Publisher]
    12. Elbasher, O.A., 2016. Vermination of climate changes using rainfall and temperature as indicators and its impacts on agricultural production in the arid zone of Sudan (1981-210) (Doctoral dissertation, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Gezira, Sudan). .[Crossref], [Google scholar]
    13. Eldaw, A.M., 2004. The Gezira Scheme: perspectives for sustainable development. [Google scholar], [Publisher]
    14. Ghavzan, N.J., Gunale, V.R., Mahajan, D.M. and Shirke, D.R., 2006. Effects of environmental factors on ecology and distribution of aquatic macrophytes. Asian journal of plant sciences. 1. [Google scholar]
    15. Haines, T.A. 1980. Acidic precipitation. Fisheries, 5 (6): 2-5.
    16. Howard-Williams C. Liptrot M.R., 1980. Submerged macrophyte communities in a brackish South African estuarine-lake system. Aquatic Botany, 9, pp.101-116. .[Crossref], [Google scholar], [Publisher]
    17. Hussner A., Stiers I., Verhofstad M.J.J.M., Bakker E.S., Grutters, B.M.C., Haury, J., Van Valkenburg J.L.C.H., Brundu G., Newman, J., Clayton J.S. Anderson, L.W.J., 2017. Management and control methods of invasive alien freshwater aquatic plants: a review. Aquatic Botany, 136, pp.112-137. [Crossref], [Google scholar], [Publisher]
    18. Junk, W.J. and Piedade, M.T.F., 1997. Plant life in the floodplain with special reference to herbaceous plants. The Central Amazon floodplain: Ecology of a pulsing system, pp.147-185. [Crossref], [Google scholar], [Publisher]
    19. Junk, W.J. and Piedade, M.T.F., 1997. Plant life in the floodplain with special reference to herbaceous plants. The Central Amazon floodplain: Ecology of a pulsing system, pp.147-185. [Crossref], [Google scholar], [Publisher]
    20. Leuven, R.S., van der Velde, G. and Kersten, H.L., 1992. Interrelations between pH and other physico-chemical factors of Dutch soft waters. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, pp.27-51. 1. [Crossref], [Google scholar], [Publisher]
    21. Leuven, R.S.E.W., Van derVelde, G. and Kersten, H.L.M. 1992. Interrelations between pH and other physico-chemical factors of Dutch soft waters. Archives Hydrobiology,126, 27–51.
    22. Kheir, M.T.K. 1992. Ecological Aspects of Aquatic weeds in Elguneid Sugar cane Scheme. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Khartoum, Sept, 1992.
    23. Pieterse, A.H., Delange, L. and Verhagen, L., 1981. A study on certain aspects of seed germination and growth of Pistia stratiotes L. Acta Botanica Neerlandica, 30(1-2), pp.47-57. [Crossref], [Google scholar], [Publisher]
    24. Carter, R., 1991. The Gezira Irrigation Scheme in Sudan: Objectives, Design and Performance. World Bank Technical Paper No. 120. By H. Plusquellec. Washington: IBRD/World Bank (1990), pp. 106, US $7.95. Experimental Agriculture, 27(2), pp.228-228. [Crossref], [Google scholar], [Publisher]
    25. Sand-Jensen, K.A.J., 1989. Environmental variables and their effect on photosynthesis of aquatic plant communities. Aquatic Botany, 34(1-3), pp.5-25. [Crossref], [Google scholar], [Publisher]
    26. SAND‐JENSEN, K.A.J., Pedersen, M.F. and Nielsen, S.L., 1992. Photosynthetic use of inorganic carbon among primary and secondary water plants in streams. Freshwater Biology, 27(2), pp.283-293. [Crossref], [Google scholar], [Publisher]
    27. Sculthorpe, C.D., 1967. Biology of aquatic vascular plants. [Crossref], [Google scholar]
    28. Sharon, M. 1997. Definition of Water Quality Parameters. Source: Testing the Waters: Chemical and Physical Vital Signs of a River by Sharon Behar. Montpelier, VT: River Watch Network, 1997. ISBN 0787234923.
    1. Thiebaut, G., Guérold, F. and Muller, S., 2002. Are trophic and diversity indices based on macrophyte communities pertinent tools to monitor water quality?. Water Research, 36(14), pp.3602-3610. [Crossref], [Google scholar], [Publisher]
    2. Titus, J.E., Feldman, R.S. and Grisé, D., 1990. Submersed macrophyte growth at low pH: I. CO 2 enrichment effects with fertile sediment. Oecologia, 84, pp.307-313. [Crossref], [Google scholar], [Publisher]
    3. WET Foundation Project 2011. Water Quality Indicators: Biological, Chemical and Physical Parameters. Retrieved from https://riverxchange.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/water_quality_indicators_final.pdf . 19, 5, 2019. 2:5.
    4. Laskowski, E.A., 1968. ANOMALOUS DISTRIBUTION OF TOXIC SOILS IN THE CASTAC VALLEY, CALIFORNIA. A STUDY BASED ON SOIL-CHEMICAL GEOGRAPHY, GEOLOGY AND GEOCHEMISTRY. University of California, Los Angeles. [Google scholar], [Publisher]
    5. Yousif, M.Y.H., 2019. Composition, Abundance and Distribution of Aquatic Weeds in Minor and AbuXX Canals, Rahad Scheme, Sudan (2017-2018) (Doctoral dissertation, M Sc. Thesis, University of Gezira, Sudan). [Google scholar]

     

    Citation Samah O. A. Alhadari, Awadallah B. Dafaallah, Mohamed S. Zaroug, Nasir A. Ibrahim, Nosiba S. Hamed.2023. Association of Aquatic Weed Abundance and Water Quality, Gezira Scheme Canals, Sudan, Journal of Research in Weed Science, 6(1), 10-22.