Document Type: Original Article

Authors

Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Prof. Jayashankar Telangana State Agriculture University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-030, Telangana, India.

Abstract

A field experiments was conducted at Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Rajendranagar during kharif 2017 for the evaluation of diuron in two different soils. The treatments consisted of diuron 80% WP at 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0 kg ha-1 along with registered formulation of pendimethalin 38.7% CS at 677 g ha-1, intercropping with green manure crop, mechanical weeding thrice at 20, 40, 60 days after sowing and unweeded control. The experiment was carried out in a randomised block design replicated thrice. The weed flora of the experimental field in red soil was dominated by Cynodon dactylon, Rottboellia exaltata, Parthenium hysterophorus, Trianthema portulacastrum and Commelina benghalensis. While in case of black soil predominant flora was Cynodon dactylon, Cyperus rotundus, Parthenium hysterophorus, Euphorbia geniculata, Tridax procumbens, Cyanotis cristata, Digera arvensis and Celosia argentea. The macronutrient contents in cotton crop were higher in polymulch, mechanical weeding thrice at 20, 40 and 60 DAS and this was comparable to pre emergence application diuron at 1.0 kg ha-1 followed by post emergence application of pyrithiobac sodium + quizalofop p ethyl in red soil and post emergence application diuron at 1.0 kg ha-1 followed by post emergence application of pyrithiobac sodium + quizalofop p ethyl and diuron at 0.75 kg ha-1 black soil. The minimum weed competition facilitated higher DMP and nutrient uptake by the plant. The nutrient removal by weeds also was minimal in polymulch, mechanical weeding thrice at 20, 40, 60 DAS, diuron at 1.0 kg ha-1 pre emergence application of pyrithiobac sodium + quizalofop p ethyl followed by post emergence application of diuron at 0.75 kg ha-1 in both red and black soil.

Keywords

Arunvenkatesh S, Kumar R.V, Rajsekhar M. 2017. Evaluation of integrated weed management in cotton. Environ Ecol. 35: 215-218.

Chander S, Kahal S.K, Panwar B.S. 1994. Nutrient uptake by american cotton and weeds under different fertility levels and methods of weed control. Harayana J Agron. 10: 237-239.

Mahar G.M, Oad F.C, Buriro U.A, Solangi G.S. 2007. Effect of Post-Emergence Herbicides on the Growth and Yield of Up-Land Cotton. Asian J Plant Sci. 6: 1282-1286.

Malarkodi N. 2017. Integrated weed management effect on weeds and seed cotton yield. Int J Environ Agric Biotech. 2: 597-606.

Manalil S, Coast O, Werth J, Chauhana B.S. 2017. Weed management in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) through weed-crop competition: A review. Crop Prot. 95: 53-59.

Pandey P, Irulappan V, Bagavathiannan M.V, Senthil-Kumar M. 2017. Impact of Combined Abiotic and Biotic Stresses on Plant Growth and Avenues for Crop Improvement by Exploiting Physio-morphological Traits. Front Plant Sci. 8: 537.

Piper CS. 1966. Soil and Plant Analysis. Hans Publisher, Bombay.

Singh M.C, Sairam C.V, Hanji M.B, Prabhukumar S. 2013. Comparative efficiency of weed control methods and nutrient losses in cotton under different ecosystems of Karnataka. J Cotton Res Dev.27: 209-212.

Sharma R. 2008. Integrated weed management in field crops. Crop Care. 35: 41-46.

Shelke D.K, Bhosle R.H. 1990. Determination of critical period of crop-weed competition in rainfed cotton. Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities. 15: 257-258.

Srinivasarao M, Anupam H, Pramanick M. 2014. Efficacy of glyphosate 71% (ammonium salt) on weed management in tea (Camellia sinensis (L). Kuntez). The Ecoscan. 4: 91-95.

Stone G.D. 2011. Field versus Farm in Warangal: Bt Cotton, Higher Yields, and Larger Questions. World Dev. 39: 387-398.