Document Type: Original Article


1 Dashen Agronomic Consulting and Research Station. Bandeirantes, State of Paraná, Brazil

2 Universidade Estadual de Maringá. Maringá, State of Paraná, Brazil

3 Universidade de Rio Verde. Rio Verde, State of Goiás, Brazil

4 Corteva Agriscience. Indianapolis, State of Indiana, United States of America


The presence of monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous weeds resistant to glyphosate in the same area makes tank mixtures of herbicides necessary. However, mixtures containing latifolicides and graminicides may result in less effectiveness. This study aimed to evaluate the interactions of auxin-mimic herbicides with acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) inhibitors. Experiments were conducted in two consecutive years in an area with a high infestation of fleabane and sourgrass, with history of resistance to glyphosate. The average heights of fleabane and sourgrass plants were, respectively: 30 and 70 cm in the first year; 80 and 120 cm in the second year. Herbicides dicamba, 2,4-D, clethodim, quizalofop and glyphosate were applied alone or in combinations with each other, in a completely randomized design, with thirty treatments and four replications. The results obtained in the control evaluation at 35 days after application were analyzed by Colby’s method. For fleabane control, in the two years evaluated, there were no problems of antagonism of auxin mimics with ACCase inhibitors. However, mixtures of ACCase inhibitors with 2,4-D were more antagonistic than mixtures with dicamba in sourgrass control, since for double mixtures between auxin mimics and ACCase inhibitors, interactions with 2,4-D were antagonistic in 62.5% cases, while for dicamba was 12.5%. In addition, antagonism effects were more pronounced in larger plants of sourgrass, and in mixtures with quizalofop, compared with clethodim. Tank mixtures of glyphosate and clethodim or quizalofop were synergistic for the control of sourgrass.


Andreotti E.G.G, Oliveira G.M.P, Ferreira L.A.I, Oliveira S.M.P, Fornarolli B.C, Fornarolli DA. 2019. Alternativas de manejo químico de capim-amargoso na cultura da soja. Rev Bras de Herb. 18: 668-681.

Barroso A.A.M, Albrecht A.J.P, Reis F.C, Victória Filho R. 2014. Interação entre herbicidas inibidores da ACCase e diferentes formulações de glyphosate na controle de capim-amargoso.Planta Daninha. 32: 619-626.

Beckie H.J, Reboud X. 2009. Selecting for weed resistance: herbicide rotation and mixture. Weed Technol. 23: 363-370.

Braz G.B.P, Oliveira Jr. R.S, Zobiole L.H.S, Rubin R.S, Voglewede C, Constantin J, Takano H.K. 2017. Sumatran Fleabane (Conyza sumatrensis) control in no-tillage soybean with diclosulam plus halauxifen-methyl. Weed Technol. 31: 184-192.

Bromilow R.H, Chamberlain K, Evans A.A. 1990. Physiochemical aspects of phloem translocation of herbicides. Weed Sci. 38: 305-314.

Cassol M, Mattiuzzi M.D, Albrecht A.J.P, Albrecht L.P, Baccin L.C, Souza C.N.Z. 2019. Efficiency of isolated and associated herbicides to control glyphosate-resistant sourgrass. Planta Daninha. 37: e019190671.

Christoffoleti P.J, Figueiredo M.R.A, Peres L.E.P, Nissen S, Gaines T. 2015. Auxinic herbicides, mechanisms of action, and weed resistance: A look into recent plant science advances. Sci Agri.72: 356-362.

Colby S.R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicides combinations. Weeds. 15: 20-22.

Constantin J, Oliveira Jr. R.S, Oliveira Neto A.M. 2013. Buva: fundamentos e recomendações para manejo. Curitiba: Omnipax.

Gemelli A. 2012. Eficácia de controle de associações de herbicidas aplicadas ao longo do desenvolvimento de Digitaria insularis resistente ao glyphosate. 2012. 80f. Dissertation (Master Degree) – Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá.

Gemelli A, Oliveira Jr. R.S, Constantin J, Braz G.B.P, Jumes T.M.C, Oliveira Neto A.M, Dan H.A, Biffe D.F. 2012. Aspectos da biologia de Digitaria insularis resistente ao glyphosate e implicações para o seu controle. Rev Bras de Herb. 11: 231-240.

Gomes H.L.L, Sambatti V.C, Dalazen G. 2020. Sourgrass control in response to the association of 2,4-D to ACCase inhibitor herbicides. Biosci J. 36: 1126-1136.

Green J.M. 1989. Herbicide antagonism at the whole plant level. Weed Technol. 3: 217-226.

Han H, Yu Q, Cawthray G.R, Powles S.B. 2013. Enhanced herbicide metabolism induced by 2,4‐D in herbicide susceptible Lolium rigidum provides protection against diclofop‐methyl. Pest Manag Sci. 69: 996-1000.

Heap I.M. 2020. The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Accessed 24 October 2020.

IAPAR – Instituto Agronômico do Paraná. 2020. Cartas Climáticas do Paraná – Precipitação. Accessed 24 October 2020.

Kruger G.R, Davis V.M, Weller S.C, Johnson W.G. 2010. Control of horseweed (Conyza canadensis) with growth regulator herbicides. Weed Technol. 24: 425-429.

Leal J.F.L, Souza A.S, Ribeiro S.R.S, Oliveira G.F.P.B, Araujo A.L.S, Borella J, Langaro A.C, Machado A.F.L, Pinho C.F. 2020. 2,4‐Dichlorophenoxyacetic‐N‐methylmethanamine and haloxyfop‐P‐methyl interaction: Sequential and interval applications to effectively control sourgrass and fleabane. Agron J. 112: 1-11.

Lúcio F.R, Kalsing A, Adegas F.S, Rossi C.V.S, Correia N.M, Gazziero D.L.P, Silva A.F. 2019. Dispersal and frequency of glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-tolerant weeds in soybean-producing edaphoclimatic microregions in Brazil. Weed Technol. 33: 217-231.

Lym R.G. 2000. Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) control with glyphosate plus 2,4-D. J. Range Manag. 53: 68-72.

Marochi A, Ferreira A, Takano H.K, Oliveira Jr. R.S, Ovejero R.F.L. 2018. Managing glyphosate-resistant weeds with cover crop associated with herbicide rotation and mixture. Cienc Agrotec. 42: 381-394.

Melo M.S.C, Rosa L.E, Brunharo C.A.C.G, Nicolai M, Christoffoleti P.J. 2012. Alternativas para o controle químico de capim-amargoso (Digitaria insularis) resistente ao glyphosate. Rev Bras de Herb. 11: 195-203.

Mendes R.R, Takano H.K, Gonçalves Netto A, Picoli Junior G.J; Cavenaghi A.L, Silva V.F.V, Nicolai M, Christoffoleti P.J; Oliveira Jr. R.S, Melo M.S.C, Ovejero R.F.L. 2020. Survey of glyphosate-resistant and susceptible Conyza sp. populations in Brazil. Anais da An Acad Bras Ciênc. in press.

Moreira M.S, Melo M.S.C, Carvalho S.J.P, Nicolai M, Christoffoleti P.J. 2010. Herbicidas alternativos para o controle de biótipos de Conyza bonariensis e C. canadensis resistentes ao herbicida glyphosate. Planta Daninha. 28: 167-175.

Mueller T.C, Barrett M, Witt W.W. 1990. A basis for the antagonistic effect of 2,4-D on haloxyfop-methyl toxicity to johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Sci. 38: 103-107.

Mueller T.C, Witt W.W, Barrett M. 1989. Antagonism of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control with fenoxaprop, haloxyfop, and sethoxydim by 2,4-D. Weed Technol. 3: 86-89.

Myers P.F, Coble H.D. 1992. Antagonism of graminicide activity on annual grass species by imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 6: 333-338.

Oliveira Neto A.M, Constantin J, Oliveira Jr. R.S, Guerra N, Dan H.A, Vilela L.M.S, Botelho L.V.P, Ávila L.A. 2013. Sistemas de dessecação de manejo com atividade residual no solo para áreas de pousio de inverno infestadas com buva. Comun Sci. 4: 120-128.

Osipe J.B, Oliveira Jr. R.S, Constantin J, Takano H.K, Biffe D.F. 2017. Spectrum of weed control with 2,4-D and dicamba herbicides associated to glyphosate or not. Planta Daninha. 35: e017160815.

Ovejero R.F.L, Takano H.K, Nicolai M, Ferreira A, Melo M.S.C, Cavenaghi A.L, Christoffoleti P.J, Oliveira Jr. R.S. 2017. Frequency and dispersal of glyphosate-resistant sourgrass (Digitaria insularis) populations across Brazilian agricultural production areas. Weed Sci. 65: 285-294.

Pereira G.R, Zobiole L.H.S, Rossi C.V.S. 2018. Resposta no controle de capim-amargoso a mistura de tanque de glyphosate e haloxifope com auxinas sintéticas. Rev Bras de Herb. 17: 606-611.

Peterson M.A, Collavo A, Ovejero R, Shivrain V, Walsh M.J. 2018. The challenge of herbicide resistance around the world: a current summary. Pest Manag Sci. 74: 2246-2259.

Petter F.A, Sulzbach A.M, Silva A.F, Fiorini I.V.A, Morais L.A, Pacheco L.P. 2015. Uso de plantas de cobertura como ferramenta na estratégia de manejo de capim-amargoso. Rev Bras de Herb. 14: 200-209.

Takano H.K, Oliveira Jr. R.S, Constantin J, Biffe D.F, Franchini L.H.M, Braz G.B.P, Rios F.A, Gheno E.A, Gemelli A. 2013. Efeito da adição do 2,4-D ao glyphosate para o controle de espécies de plantas daninhas de difícil controle. Rev Bras de Herb. 12: 1-13.

Takano H.K, Ovejero R.F.L, Belchior G.G, Maymone G.P.L, Dayan F.E. 2020. ACCase-inhibiting herbicides: mechanism of action, resistance evolution and stewardship. Sci Agri. 78: e20190102.

Taylor H.F, Loader M.P.C, Norris S.J. 1983. Compatible and antagonistic mixtures of diclofop-methyl and flamprop-methyl with herbicides used to control broad-leaved weeds. Weed Res. 24: 185-190.

Todd B.G, Stobbe E.H. 1980. The basis of antagonistic effect of 2,4-D on diclofop-methyl toxicity to wild oat (Avenua fatua). Weed Sci. 28: 371-377.

Vangessel M.J. 2001. Glyphosate-resistant horseweed from Delaware. Weed Sci.49: 703-705.

Zobiole L.H.S, Krenchinski F.H, Albrecht A.J.P, Pereira G, Lúcio F.R, Rossi C, Rubin R.S. 2016. Controle de capim-amargoso perenizado em pleno florescimento. Rev Bras de Herb. 15: 157-164.